PSG Vs Nantes: Player Ratings – An Honest Analysis

Madrid Editorial Teams

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Mar 21, 2025

52 visitor like this post

Share

PSG vs Nantes: Player Ratings – An Honest Analysis

The Parc des Princes witnessed a clash between giants and underdogs as Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) took on FC Nantes. While the final score might suggest a comfortable victory for the Parisians, a closer look reveals a performance with both highs and lows. This detailed analysis provides honest player ratings, dissecting individual contributions and highlighting key moments from the match.

PSG Player Ratings: A Mixed Bag of Performances

PSG's dominance was expected, but the execution wasn't always flawless. Let's break down the individual performances:

Gianluigi Donnarumma (7/10): A relatively quiet game for Donnarumma, but his commanding presence in the box and a couple of crucial saves prevented any unexpected scares. His distribution, as usual, was sharp and accurate.

Achraf Hakimi (7.5/10): Hakimi's attacking prowess was on full display. His tireless runs down the right flank caused Nantes constant problems. While his defensive contributions could be improved, his offensive impact earns him a solid rating. Key Moment: His perfectly weighted cross led to a crucial goal.

Marquinhos (7/10): The captain led by example, displaying his usual composure and organizational skills at the back. Solid defensively, though he could have been more assertive in a couple of key moments.

Sergio Ramos (6.5/10): A mixed performance from Ramos. While his experience and leadership were invaluable, he was occasionally caught out of position and lacked the pace to deal with some of Nantes' quicker attackers. Still, his aerial dominance remained a significant asset.

Nuno Mendes (6/10): A slightly subdued performance from Mendes. While his attacking intent was there, his final ball often lacked precision, and he was occasionally exposed defensively. Needs to improve consistency.

Marco Verratti (8/10): The midfield maestro orchestrated PSG's attacks with his typical elegance and precision. His passing range and vision were key to unlocking Nantes' defense. A truly commanding performance. Key Moment: His through ball to Messi for the second goal was sublime.

Vitinha (7/10): Vitinha showed his tireless work rate and improved defensive contributions. His ability to win back possession and initiate attacks from midfield was a crucial part of PSG’s overall performance.

Lionel Messi (9/10): The Argentine magician was at his dazzling best. His goal was a testament to his genius, showcasing his incredible close control and finishing ability. A match-winning performance. Man of the Match contender.

Neymar Jr. (8/10): Neymar displayed his creativity and skill, creating numerous chances for his teammates. While he didn't find the back of the net himself, his overall contribution was significant. Key Moment: His assist for Messi's goal highlighted his vision and playmaking ability.

Kylian Mbappé (7.5/10): Mbappé scored a crucial goal. Though not at his most electrifying, his pace and finishing ability remain a constant threat. He could have perhaps been more involved in the build-up play.

Hugo Ekitiké (6/10): A decent performance from Ekitiké, but he needs to be more clinical in front of goal to cement his place in the starting XI.

Nantes Player Ratings: Fighting Spirit, but Lacking Firepower

Nantes put up a spirited fight against a superior opponent. However, their limitations in the attacking third were exposed.

(Overall Team Rating: 6/10): While their defensive organization was commendable at times, the lack of cutting edge in attack proved to be their downfall.

Conclusion: A Victory, but Room for Improvement

PSG secured a victory, but the performance wasn't flawless. While individual brilliance shone through, especially from Messi and Verratti, there's still room for improvement in terms of collective cohesion and defensive solidity. Nantes, despite the defeat, displayed admirable resilience and fighting spirit. The match highlighted both the strengths and weaknesses of both teams, providing valuable insight into their current form and potential. Future performances will determine if these observations hold true.